查看完整版本: When To Lease Instead Of Buying

When To Lease Instead Of Buying

When Is Leasing More Prudent Than Buying?
You probably buy a variety of items. And, if you are like most purchasers, you rarely consider whether or not you should lease the items rather than buy them.

Purchasing is the function of paying for the ownership of an item, whereas leasing is the function of paying for the right to use an item.

Leasing isn't an option for many items, particularly consumables like MRO supplies. However, it can be a viable alternative when acquiring expensive assets like vehicles, office equipment, and shop-floor machinery.

So when do you know if you should compare leasing versus buying options? Here are a few situations that may favor leasing:

When there is a high likelihood that the asset will be obsolete before it is fully
depreciated from an accounting standpoint.
When the current year capital budget is not large enough to support the purchase
of the asset.
When the time period for using the asset is shorter than the asset's useful life and your
organization doesn't want the burden of reselling the asset.
When purchasing the asset would require extensive record keeping and asset
management and your organization does not have sufficient record keeping
or asset management resources.
When your organization needs to demonstrate a stronger financial position to its
customers, prospects, potential and current investors, creditors, and others.
Unlike leasing, financing a purchase shows debt on the balance sheet. Too much
debt is unattractive to the aforementioned constituencies.
If (a) the acquisition meets one of these criteria, (b) your organization can accept restrictions on how the asset can be used, and (c) the present value of total lease costs is not substantially higher than the present value of total purchase costs, leasing may be the better alternative. You owe it to your organization to consider the option.